A trap relying on optical pumping

P. Bouyer, J. Dalibard, P. Lemonde, A. Michaud, M. Ben Dahan, C. Salomon

École Normale Supérieure, Lab. Kastler-Brossel, 24 rue Lhomond, Paris CEDEX 75231, France

Appeared in: Proceedings EQEC. 29 aug-2 sept 1994, pp. 2-3 (1994) (reference) (image)

    The usual way of obtaining laser cooled atoms at high densities is to use a magneto-optical trap.1 In such a spontaneous force trap, the optical Earnshaw theorem is circumvented2,3 by use of a magnetic fiend gradient together with optical pumping. Unfortunately, in many experiments such as frequency standards or sub-recoil cooling,4,5 this magnetic field may cause severe limitations, owing to the difficulty of removing residual fields after the operation of the magneto-optical trap.

    We have investigated a new kind of radiation pressure that requires no magnetic field and also circumvents the Earnshaw theorem by optical pumping, this trap consists of six circularly polarized divergent beams (Fig. 1) and works on the red of a  Jg --> Je = Jg+1  atomic transition with  Jg > 1/2. The spatially varying intensity leads to a position dependent optical pumping and creates a restoring force on an atom displaced from the center.

    We have demonstrated this trap in a vapor cell using the 852-nm cesium  Jg=4 --> Je=5  transition.  The performance of this trap in terms of number of trapped atoms is within one order of magnitude of that of an optimized magneto-optical trap employing the same laser beams In our preliminary experiments, we have trapped up to 5 × 107 atoms in a 300 µm 1/e1/2 radius trap at about 40 µK and an average density of 1011 at/cm3.

Figure 1

Figure 1 - Experimental set-up: Each circularly polarized 20 mW 852-nm laser beam is focused at 3.5 cm from the center of the trap using six objectives with N.A.=0.4. At a detuning of -10 MHz, the trap contains ~5 × 107 atoms.

References:

  1. E. Raab, M. Prentiss, A. Cable, S. Chu, D.E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 , 2631 (1987).
  2. A. Ashkin, J.P. Gordon, Opt. Lett. 8 511 (1983).
  3. D. Pritchard, E. Raab, V. Bagnato, C. Wieman, R. Watts, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 310 (1986).
  4. A. Aspect, E. Arimondo, R. Kaiser, N. Vanteenkiste, C. Cohen-Tannoudji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 826 (1988).
  5. M. Kasevich, S. Chu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 1741 (1992).
©1994, 2006, 2007  Valid HTML 4.01!